There are two positions to take regarding the Iranian nuclear program: it doesn't matter, we can deter them, or it matters, we must stop them.
In my view, the first position — that we can contain Iran as we did the Soviet Union — is a product of wishful thinking and misread history. But at least it's internally coherent.
What is incoherent is President Barack Obama's position. He declares the Iranian program intolerable — "I do not have a policy of containment; I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon" — yet stands by as Iran rapidly approaches nuclearization.
A policy so knowingly and obviously contradictory is a declaration of weakness and passivity. And this, as national security analysts Anthony Cordesman, James Phillips and others have argued, can increase the chance of war. It creates, writes Cordesman, "the same conditions that helped trigger World War II — years of negotiations and threats, where the threats failed to be taken seriously until war became all too real."
This has precipitated the current U.S.-Israeli crisis, sharpened by the president's rebuff of the Israeli prime minister's request for a meeting during his upcoming U.S. visit. The old arguments, old excuses, old pretensions have become ridiculous:
• Sanctions. The director of national intelligence testified to Congress at the beginning of the year that they had zero effect in slowing the nuclear program. Now the International Atomic Energy Agency reports that the Iranian nuclear program, far from slowing, is accelerating. Iran has doubled the number of high-speed centrifuges at their facility outside Qom, built into a mountain to make it impregnable to air attack.
This week, the IAEA reported Iranian advances in calculating the explosive power of an atomic warhead. It noted once again Iran's refusal to allow inspection of its weapons testing facility and cited satellite evidence of Iranian attempts to hide what's gone on there.
The administration's response is that it's imposed the toughest sanctions ever. So what — they've had no effect on the nuclear program.
• Negotiations. The latest, supposedly last-ditch round of talks in Istanbul, Baghdad, then Moscow has collapsed. The West even conceded to Iran the right to enrich — shattering a decade-long consensus and six Security Council resolutions demanding its cessation.
Iran's response? Contemptuous rejection. The mullahs have strung Obama along for more than three years and still see no credible threat emanating from the one country that could disarm them.
• Diplomatic isolation. The administration boasts that Iran is becoming isolated. Really? Just two weeks ago, 120 nations showed up in Tehran for a meeting of the Non-Aligned Movement — against U.S. entreaties not to attend. Even the U.N. secretary-general attended — after the administration asked him not to.
The Obama policy is in shambles, which is why Cordesman argues that the only way to prevent a nuclear Iran without war is to establish a credible military threat to make Iran recalculate and reconsider. That means U.S. red lines: deadlines beyond which Washington will not allow itself to be strung, as well as benchmark actions that would trigger a response.
Which made all the more shocking Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's dismissal of the notion of U.S. red lines. The sleeping giant continues to slumber and wait, as the administration puts it, "for Iran to live up to its international obligations."
The Obama policy is a rhetorical commitment to stopping Iran, yet real-life actions will allow Iran to go nuclear. Yet while it does nothing, the administration warns Israel sternly, even threateningly, not to strike the Iranian nuclear program. With zero prospect of his policy succeeding, Obama insists on Israeli inaction, even as Iran races to close the window of opportunity for any successful attack.
Not since its birth six decades ago has Israel been so cast adrift by its closest ally.
Krauthammer writes for The Washington Post.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/opinion/column/guest/charles-krauthammer-abandonment-of-israel-by-u-s/article_ebd2ccfe-0118-11e2-9485-0019bb2963f4.html
h/t CN
