http://www.independentsentinel.com/2013/02/sunstein-explained-obamas-new-bill-of-rights-in-a-recent-op-ed/
http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=169910
Sunstein
Explained Obama’s New Bill of Rights in a Recent Op-Ed
February
1, 2013
By
Sara Noble
Cass Sunstein, Obama’s former regulatory czar, wrote an
op-ed in Bloomberg News on the 28th assuring us
that President Obama is “not committed to equality of outcome but a fair
opportunity with decent security.”
He said Obama is interested in updating a “second
Bill of Rights” alongside the existing one.
His idea is to model it after Franklin Roosevelt’s economic
Bill of Rights. [Obama frequently sees himself as one of the acclaimed
presidents and in this case apparently it is Franklin Roosevelt]
Sunstein wrote that Roosevelt believed the Bill of Rights and
the Constitution guaranteed ”political rights” but did not assure
equality in the pursuit of happiness, thus the need for an economic Bill of
Rights.
FDR did not mean to change the Constitution nor did he mean
that the SCOTUS should enforce it. His Bill of Rights was a political
statement, Sunstein said.
Sunstein emphasized that the national government is not to
take control of the means of production to make this happen. However, while
claiming Obama does not want to change the Constitution, he makes it clear he
wants Congress to change the law.
Roosevelt’s economic Bill of Rights which Sunstein refers
to, and which he claims Obama is emulating, includes the following:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries
or shops or farms or mines of the Nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and
clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at
a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in
an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies
at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to
achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of
old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.
All of these rights spell security. And after this war is
won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights,
to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
Where Sunstein’s article gets particularly dicey is when he
cites examples of Obama’s Bill of Rights which he has begun to implement:
The Affordable Care Act
Expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit (people who do not
earn enough to pay taxes are actually given taxpayer money)
Extension of Unemployment insurance
The Race to the Top in which the government doles out money
according to how well teachers and students meet rigid, one-size-fits-all
performance standards
All of these accomplishments push our country towards
government-control over our healthcare, education and our money (through heavy
taxation).
One could argue that Obama stops short of socialism but
there is no question he has pushed us further in that direction.
The Occupy Wall Street crowd, that Obama sympathized with,
believe in a wage for every person whether they work or not. I don’t believe
Obama is looking to do that or is he? Where will he draw the line?
People become concerned when they hear Justice Ginsberg laud
the South African Constitution, which is a social justice manifesto. People see
problems when there are similarities between Obama’s updated Bill of Rights to
that of the U.S.S.R.’s Bill of Rights.
The now frequent calls for a new Constitution from the
academics like Cass Sunstein are adding to concerns by traditional and more
Conservative Americans.
The constant demonization of traditional values and people
who adhere to them makes people very nervous. The attack on religious liberty
via Obamacare and the erosion of the Second Amendment are very real.
We don’t know where President Obama plans to end up but he
is fundamentally changing the United States and some of us believe that our
country didn’t need the changes he is forcing through. Many of us do not want
his additional set of “rights.”
No comments:
Post a Comment