Showing posts with label JOHN NOLTE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JOHN NOLTE. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

'WAPO' DUMPS ITS OMBUDSMAN



http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/02/19/WaPo-Dumps-Its-Ombudsman-Will-Anyone-Notice



'WAPO' DUMPS ITS OMBUDSMAN

 108
 0
 11
 

Print ArticleSend a Tip

For some inexplicable reason, Howard Kurtz likes the idea of paying a fat salary to a figurehead who gives a media institution a false sheen of accountability. Gee, can't imagine why.

I understand the financial pressures that Baron faces. But an ombudsman gives unhappy readers, politicians and groups someone to complain to. He or she holds the editors and reporters accountable. When the Post was hit by the Janet Cooke scandal, the ombudsman was absolutely indispensible in investigating what happened and showing the world that the paper would not cover up the mess created by its fabricating Pulitzer Prize winner.
The Post was one of the first newspapers to employ an ombudsman. The New York Times didn’t have one until a decade ago, when its own mega-scandal (involving Jayson Blair) led the paper to finally create the role of in-house critic. The Los Angeles Times and USA Today don’t have them. Neither do the television networks.
And the difference between those outlets that employ an ombudsman and those that don't is what exactly?
Is there anyone out there who honestly believes the once-legendary Washington Post is a better, more objective, more responsible news outlet than those among its competitors that don't employ an ombudsman?
What did Patrick Pexton do to deter the Post from engaging in this corruption? Moreover, during the 2012 election, the Post was one of the most biased news outlets out there. More than once, it was caught openly coordinating its own big stories with the Obama campaign's anti-Romney narratives. All during Pexton's watch.
Overall, The Washington Post is a disgraceful newspaper, and getting worse every day. So, for some reason, the thought of another media elitist forced to enter the same Obama economy the media foisted on the rest of us doesn’t make me want to pick up a violin.
If an ombudsman or a media reporter like Howard Kurtz did their jobs with any amount of integrity, they would be as despised by the media-at-large as Internal Affairs is in any police department.
The fact that Pexton and Howie are beloved in MediaLand tells you everything you need to know about how necessary they are.
                                                                  
Follow  John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC

Sunday, December 2, 2012

MY PURELY NON-POLITICAL TOP 5 IDEAS TO IMMEDIATELY IMPROVE CNN

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/12/01/Copy%20of%20My-Purely-Non-Political-Top-5-Ideas-To-Immediately-Improve-CNN



 21
 1
 8
 

Print ArticleSend a Tip
 30 Nov 2012 42POST A COMMENT

New CNN Chief, Jeff Zucker, gave a few moments to The Incredibly Useless Howard Kurtz. Zucker said in an interview that CNN programs need “more differentiation” and “more variety, and I don’t mean that in the entertainment sense.” With CNN’s ratings rising and falling with the news cycle, Zucker said, “the overriding issue is what do you do beyond the 25 days a year when there’s major breaking news?  You don’t need to be partisan. CNN does need to stick to a nonpartisan point of view. That doesn’t mean there can’t be more passion and excitement.”

Whatever.
Anyway, because I care so dang much, I'm going to give Zucker the keys to the ratings kingdom...
1. Fire People...Now
MSNBC is wrong about everything, but as far as pure television, daytime MSNBC does not suck in the least. Thanks mainly to its daytime hosts, MSNBC is an extremely well-produced cable news network that's appealing to the eye and ear. Thankfully, my shift ends before MSNBC's insufferable primetime line-up arrives.
CNN, however, is dull as dishwater and loaded with unappealing personalities: Soledad O'Brien, Carol Costello, Ashleigh Banfield, Don Lemon, and Wolf Blitzer just need to go. Watching those five is like fingers on a chalkboard -- the worst part of my day.
2. For 'Excitment,' Improve CNN's Look
If Zucker wants more excitement, he should start with CNN's "look," because the network looks awful: muted colors, muted graphics, and roundtable discussions that look as though they were produced on cable access. Granted, most of CNN's "excitement" problems come from the on-air personalities, and if those same personalities attempt to artificially ramp up the energy, it's only going to heighten their many flaws -- which is why they need to go.  But...
MSNBC and Fox News are great-looking networks. Ape them yesterday.
3. Remove the Liberal Bias
What's most troubling about Zucker's statement is that he apparently believes CNN is nonpartisan. That shouldn't come as a surprise from a former NBC guy, but the ratings needle just isn't going to move unless the liberal bias problem is exterminated -- which has always been CNN's primary problem.
MSNBC at least doesn't lie to its audience about its biases. Fox News does an excellent job of building a wall between its straight news and it's openly partisan programming. CNN, though, lies and lies and lies and lies.
24/7, it's left-wing agenda-pushing disguised as nonpartisan news at CNN, which is insulting to both left and right.
No one likes to feel conned, so no one watches CNN.
4. Stop Being Narrative Slaves
If someone handed me CNN, the very first thing I would do is something Fox News does that explains their success beyond the ideological... I would extricate CNN from The Narrative.
One of the reasons a lot of Democrats watch Fox News is due to the fact that Fox covers news stories the rest of the media doesn't. Because Fox isn't a slave to The Narrative, they actually offer a variety --  not just of opinion and worldview -- but also in the topics they find important and worthy of focusing on. 
If you watch or read or listen to any part of the mainstream media, there's absolutely no reason to watch CNN. If you listen to NPR or read the New York Times or watch the Today Show, because CNN is a slave to The Narrative, watching CNN is redundant.  
Granted, sometimes some news is so big and important you have to cover what everyone else is, but outside of those 20 to 30 days per year, why cover what everyone else is covering?
For example, during the 2012 campaign, CNN was just as  invested in the pointless Narratives surrounding Big Bird, binders, Romney's taxes, and the 47 percent video as the hundreds of other MSM outlets out there. All CNN was doing was rewarming news people could get in 250 different places.
What CNN should do is what Fox does and that's break free of this trap and make its own decision about what the news will be. I'm not talking ideology -- I'm talking variety.
If people get used to the idea that CNN covers the news-news but also devotes a large part of its day covering what no one else does -- that they are not Narrative Slaves -- people will tune in to see what CNN's up to.
Hundreds of million click on Drudge many times a day to see what Drudge finds interesting -- what Drudge considers newsworthy. You never know what he's up to or focusing on. So you tune in.
CNN never surprises in this regard. It's just a network filled with unappealing people in unappealing settings repeating what every other outlet is repeating.
5. Make Piers Morgan Grow a Mustache
You're just going to have to trust me on this one. 

*This story is part of the Big Journalism Live Blog, which you can bookmark here.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC

Friday, September 21, 2012

UNIVISION DEBACLE: The caliph خليفة Benedict Arnold MISLEADS, CONDESCENDS TO LATINO COMMUNITY



 8
 0
 2
 

Print ArticleSend a Tip
 21 Sep 2012, 7:30 AM PDT 2 POST A COMMENT

While everyone is talking about Obama's revealing comments yesterday admitting defeat when it comes to changing Washington DC from the inside, what struck me most after watching his entire Univision interview was Obama's condescending and deceitful to answer when pressed on the issue of immigration reform.

And I'm not even talking about Obama declaring the lack of immigration reform "my biggest failure," as opposed to creating jobs. I'm talking about this:
-

-
Anyone who remembers the 2008 Saddleback Church forum, knows that Obama just doesn’t do well in situations where he's being questioned by someone who isn't a part of his lapdog media. Throughout yesterday's interview, Univision reporter Jorge Ramos pressed Obama, expecting truthful answers. Not being used to this kind of dogged intellectual honesty from anyone in media, Obama really fumbled his way through much of the session.   
From where I stand, though, the worst part was the clip above.  First off, Obama addresses Ramos and the audience as though they're children in need of a history lesson: Let me sit here and explain to you children how the three branches of government works. You obviously don't know this because if you did, you never would've asked such a stupid question.
Secondly, Obama's brazenly misleading here. One fact Obama and the corrupt media would love for us to forget is that for two long years Obama enjoyed blank check approval in both chambers of Congress (including a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate). But during this time, not once did Obama submit anything in the form of immigration reform, even though he most certainly could've gotten it passed. Which makes what he said about Republicans all the more outrageous:
The president said that he was also taken aback by the resistance he said he received from Republican lawmakers when he reached out to them about an immigration bill, especially from those who previously supported such measures.
"I am happy to take responsibility for being naive here," he said.
What in the world do Republicans have to do with anything when you own the Executive and Legislative branches of government for two freakin' years?
The Romney campaign has a real opportunity here. You take that clip above and intercut it with the facts and point out the insulting condescension and you just might have yourself something.


Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC

Saturday, July 28, 2012

El Presidente is making it far easier for all of us all around the world

This really makes me proud to be an Amerikan


OBAMA'S TOP TEN UNITED KINGDOM GAFFES

 102
 8
 798
 

Print ArticleSend a Tip
 28 Jul 2012, 8:00 AM PDT 67 POST A COMMENT

So what did Mitt Romney do that was so terrible? What was the supposed "gaffe" that launched a thousand news-cycles and will likely lead tomorrow's Sunday shows?

While in London, Romney was asked by NBC's Brian Williams about the security situation surrounding the London Olympics, something that has received a ton of media attention, and this is what he said:
Mr. Romney told NBC News he saw “a few things that were disconcerting” about London’s preparations. “The stories about the private security firm not having enough people, supposed strike of immigration and customs officials, that obviously is not something which is encouraging,” he said.
Pause for … gasp.
Pause for … and egads.
That's right, Mitt Romney answered a question honestly.
I'm not saying Romney couldn't have been more diplomatic with his answer, but the perfect storm of horrible American news coverage that is now entering its third day is a punishment that does not fit the misdemeanor.
What we're really seeing, though, is our corrupt media at its worst -- a media so partisan and devoid of integrity that they look for any real or perceived mistake to keep the blistering spotlight as far away from Obama's failed record as possible and always on Mitt Romney.
That's not to say that the hysterical reaction from the notoriously hysterical British press shouldn't have been covered by our corrupt news media, but what our corrupt media's doing is much more than that.
Our media is choosing to make this the biggest story in the land; choosing to make this a bigger story than our collapsing economy; and most certainly choosing to attempt to make Romney's "gaffe" a defining moment -- something the corrupt media has never done to our gaffe-tastic president whose international mistakes frequently play like something out of an Inspector Clouseau movie.
In other words, what the media is doing to Romney has nothing to do with journalism and everything to do with partisan politics. Even as we learned our GDP had plummeted to 1.5% yesterday, Romney's London trip remained The Story. And you are damned right this is intentional.
This is all about the media OPENLY coordinating with the Obama campaign to win reelection for a failed president. And the only way to do that is to turn the failed president's opponent into an alternative that isn't acceptable. So as our economy burns and national security secrets fly out the White House window and guns are handed to Mexican drug lords -- the media enters day three of ensuring Romney remains beaten senseless by The Narrative.
This isn’t bias; it's corruption. And as proof, here are 10 examples of Obama's British gaffes, all of which the media has intentionally covered up or underplayed -- all of which are much more embarrassing than a candidate answering a question a little less diplomatically than he should have.
In no particular order:
1. The Toast:
 President Inspector Clouseau completely bungles a toast to Queen Elizabeth:
The screwup: At this point, the band launched into “God Save the Queen” — but Obama continued speaking over the music: “. . . for the vitality of the special relationship between our peoples, and in the words of Shakespeare, ‘To this blessed plot, this Earth, this realm, this England.’ To the Queen.” She gave him a look, he set down his glass, and then stood motionless until the music stopped. Then everyone picked up their glasses. Oops.
Watch the video. The reaction around Captain Clueless is absolutely hysterical.
2. The iPod:
President Inspector Clouseau gifts Queen Elizabeth with an iPod loaded with videos and photos of…himself:
The bestowing of the Royal iPod brought a cringe from one top etiquette expert, who said it confirmed that Obama hasn’t figured out presidential gift-giving. Or that they shouldn’t all come from Best Buy[.]
3. The Incompatible DVDs:
President Inspector Clouseau gifts Prime Minister Gordon Brown with a cheap box-set of DVDs incompatible with British DVD players:
As he headed back home from Washington, Gordon Brown must have rummaged through his party bag with disappointment.
Because all he got was a set of DVDs. Barack Obama, the leader of the world's richest country, gave the Prime Minister a box set of 25 classic American films - a gift about as exciting as a pair of socks.
Gordon Brown is a well-known movie fan, so I'm sure he not only appreciated the White House laying out a cool two-hundred bucks or so for a pile of DVDs he couldn't watch, but also gifting him with movies any movie fan would already own.
4. The Hug:
Touching the Queen is as big a no-no at Buckingham Palace as sincere patriotism is at the Obama White House:
Whoever briefed Michelle Obama on the things one does and doesn't do with one's hands when one meets the Queen must be wondering what went wrong.
Within minutes of their first encounter at Buckingham Palace yesterday, America's first lady broke royal protocol by doing the unthinkable: she gave the Queen a hug. The monarch, for her part, responded with equally flagrant disregard for convention by returning the gesture.
If only Michelle were so eager to embrace American liberty.
5. The Throwing of Churchill Out of the Oval Office:
Thanks to some dogged (and very entertaining) reporting from ABC's Jake Tapper, we've finally gotten to the bottom of the Obama White House's lies surrounding Churchill Bust-Gate. But the bottom line is that this remains 100% true:
But when British officials offered to let Mr. Obama to hang onto the bust for a further four years, the White House said: "Thanks, but no thanks."
Duzza yer dug bite?
6.  The Kitchen Meeting:
"The Special Relationship" hits bottom as Obama makes the British Prime Minister chase him around America like a scorned school girl:
British officials made five attempts to secure official talks with the US President and even agreed to a policy change in an attempt to land a joint appearance between the two leaders, said diplomatic sources.
But the White House rebuffed the offers and Mr. Brown, who had hoped to increase his popularity by appearing on his own with Mr. Obama, had to settle instead for a snatched conversation with the President in a New York kitchen.
7. The, uhm, Special Relationship?
Special Relationship? What Special Relationship?
The gratuitous words of a State Department official in May 2009 were particularly harmful. “There’s nothing special about Britain,” the official said. “You’re just the same as the other 190 countries in the world. You shouldn’t expect special treatment.”
I don't see any Special Relationship. Do you see a Special Relationship?
8. The, uhm Special Relationship? - Part Deux:
Why don’t you take a look, because I've looked all over and there's no Special Relationshipanywhere:
The Obama administration is not known for its pro-British track record, but this is by far the strongest indication yet that the current White House has little regard for the Special Relationship and its unique role in modern American history. At a White House photo opportunity with French President Nicolas Sarkozy today … President Obama had this to say:
“We don’t have a stronger friend and stronger ally than Nicolas Sarkozy, and the French people.”
Quite what the French have done to merit this kind of high praise from the US president is difficult to fathom, and if the White House means what it says this represents an extraordinary sea change in US foreign policy.
Toldja there was no Special Relationship.
9. The Old Obama's-Too-Tired-To-Treat-The-British-PM-With-Respect Ploy:
It was March of 2009 and the President was exhausted from putting together the policies that would ensure our economy would never-ever-ever-ever recover.
Sources close to the White House say Mr. Obama and his staff have been "overwhelmed" by the economic meltdown and have voiced concerns that the new president is not getting enough rest.
British officials, meanwhile, admit that the White House and US State Department staff were utterly bemused by complaints that the Prime Minister should have been granted full-blown press conference and a formal dinner, as has been customary. They concede that Obama aides seemed unfamiliar with the expectations that surround a major visit by a British prime minister.
But Washington figures with access to Mr. Obama's inner circle explained the slight by saying that those high up in the administration have had little time to deal with international matters, let alone the diplomatic niceties of the special relationship.
Hey, putting together an economy that produces more food stamp recipients and people on disability than jobs is exhausting.
10. The Compromising of British Intelligence:
The White House leaking national security secrets to make the President look good?
An alleged intelligence leak regarding a covert operation that thwarted an "underwear bomb" plot last week is now creating distrust and ill feelings within the U.S. intelligence community and has led to increased talk about intelligence leaks at the highest levels of government, according to terrorism experts on Friday.
Former Central Intelligence Agency officers are openly blaming President Barack Obama, his administration, and possibly his campaign committee for undermining national security and compromising the British domestic and foreign intelligence agencies, MI5 and MI6, for political reasons, according to a U.S. counterterrorism source who contacted the Law Enforcement Examiner on Friday and requested anonymity.
"When presidents are in trouble because of their failing domestic agenda, they attempt to look presidential by getting involved in military or intelligence operations. And Obama has taken that to a whole new level," said the source.
This White House leak security secrets for political gain?
Our White House?
Shut up, racists.  
-----
The list above is not only proof that Obama is frequently a downright fool who can't stop embarrassing himself and his own country (and this list only pertains to only a single country), but that the media covers for him.
Granted, mistakes happen. Ten mistakes, however, are defining. But the corrupt media refuses to portray this President as anything other than calm, cool, and competent, even as everything he touches turns to crap.
Moreover, on The Stupid Scale, compare even one item on the Obama list to Mitt Romney answering a question inelegantly. Nothing compares. Nothing.
But damn the truth. The media is determined to portray Romney as everything Obama truly is -- a clueless, dishonest, narcissistic boob.
And it's only July.

Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC