Showing posts with label WILLIAM BIGELOW. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WILLIAM BIGELOW. Show all posts

Friday, September 21, 2012

The caliph خليفة Benedict Arnold ADMINISTRATION PAVES THE WAY FOR SHARIA LAW



 707
 70
 16.5K
 

Print ArticleSend a Tip
 6 Aug 2012 717 POST A COMMENT

The most terrifying danger Americans face from a second Barack Obama term isn’t the economy, which is scary enough.

The most harrowing prospect is the Obama Administration’s passivity in the face of attempts to introduce aspects of sharia law into our legal system.  Now there is strong and open evidence of the Obama administration collaborating with Islamist activists to ensure the path toward sharia law is accelerated.
Just last week, Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division, was asked this question by Trent Franks (R-AZ), a member of the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on the Constitution: "Will you tell us here today that this Administration's Department of Justice will never entertain or advance a proposal that criminalizes speech against any religion?"
Perez refused to answer. Four times.
And why would Franks target Perez?
Here’s why:
Last October, at George Washington University, there was a meeting between DOJ officials, including Perez, and Islamist advocates against free speech. Representatives from the Islamist side included Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). The ISNA was an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding trial in 2008, as well as functioning as a Muslim Brotherhood Front. The leader of the Islamist attack was Sahar Aziz, an Egyptian-born American lawyer and Fellow at the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding, a Muslim advocacy group based in Michigan. At the meeting, the Islamists lobbied for:
  1. Cutbacks in U.S. anti-terror training
  2. Limits on the power of terrorism investigators
  3. Changes in agent training manuals
  4. A legal declaration that criticism of Islam in the United States should be considered racial discrimination
Aziz said that the word “Muslim” has become “racialized” and, once American criticism of Islam was silenced, the effect would be to "take [federal] money away from local police departments and fusion centers who are spying on all of us.”
And what was the response from Perez and the DOJ officials? 
Nothing.
That’s right: no objection, no defense of our first amendment right to free speech.


h/t DJ

'OCCUPY UNMASKED' REVIEW: SHREDDING THE LIES OF THE MOVEMENT



 39
 3
 84
 

Print ArticleSend a Tip
 20 Sep 2012 27 POST A COMMENT

The Occupy Wall Street movement was not an innocent attempt by youth across America that broke out spontaneously. It was, instead, a movement that was insidiously plotted by forces that intended to eliminate the United States forever from the free, liberty-loving, last best hope on earth it has always been.

The late Andrew Breitbart, with his close friend Stephen K. Bannon, producer of the hit documentary "The Undefeated," teamed up to make "Occupy Unmasked." Breitbart’s last work rips away the façade from the Occupy movement and lays bare for all the world to see how nefarious the movement truly is.

As Bannon succinctly states, “For those who’ve been paying attention, this film is an affirmation. For those who haven’t, it’s a revelation.”
No stone was left unturned in the making of the film; the duo pored over video evidence, documented proof, and exposed e-mail chains galore. Bannon was unflinching in his condemnation:
This is not a bunch of college kids and hippies putting this thing together. Below the surface is a very dark, very ugly and very dangerous group of people. They managed to change the narrative. Their goal is to create chaos, destroy the system. They want to create anarchy, put the system in crisis and from crisis gain power.
The film's first four minutes remind viewers of the situation in the country in 2011, with the news focused on the national debt and the debt ceiling, parroting the meme that the Occupy movement grew from innocent youths protesting the American system. Bannon and Breitbart then show exactly how “innocent” the Occupiers were: from the violence at the encampments, including multiple rapes, to the drug use; from the property destruction to the defecating on police cars.
The film starts to appear even more sinister when it reveals the organizers behind the protests. One organizer, Malcolm Harris, a self-described communist, lied to the Occupiers in order to get them to Zuccotti park by telling them the band Radiohead would be playing there. And just as you’d expect, a New York Times writer helped him get that message out.
Employee unions were instrumental in organizing the protests, of course, since their socialistic goals were absolutely in sync with the Occupy movement. "Occupy Unmasked" even shows how the unions are still organizing, protesting and occupying.
But the most frightening information the film divulges is exactly what the real goals of the Occupiers not only were, but are for the future. If forewarned means forearmed, there is no question that this film must be seen by Americans if they don’t want their children and children’s children to wake up one day in a fascist state where liberty is a distant memory.





http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2012/09/20/Occupy-Unmasked-Rips-the-Lies-of-the-Movement-to-Shreds

Monday, September 10, 2012

WHAT WILL AN El Presidente SECOND TERM LOOK LIKE?



 34
 3
 172
 

Print ArticleSend a Tip
 9 Sep 2012 68 POST A COMMENT

How dangerous would a Barack Obama second term be? Obama has tried to hide his agenda so the American public hasn’t a clue, but the facts we do know all add up to a very bleak picture.

Small businesses: First, it is clear that Obama will keep the tax hikes on those making $250,000 or more:  
“In interviews leading up to the Democratic National Convention, Obama talked about how he’d govern if he won another term. He told Time Magazine that because of his policy contrasts with Romney, he’d interpret a win as giving him a mandate to maintain the Bush-era tax cuts for people making less than $250,000.”
Second, those tax hikes will kill small businesses:
“Researchers determined the plan would actually subject 2.1 million business owners to higher rates; specifically, those who pay pass-through taxes, like most partnerships, LLCs and S-Corporations. The result, less capital in the hands of business owners and diminished labor supply, would cost the United States an estimated $200 billion in economic output and 710,000 jobs.”
And further testimony to how Obama’s plan will crush small business is here:
“New research, released today by the National Federation of Independent Business, shows that allowing tax relief on the top individual rates to expire will hurt job creation and the economy. The report, published by top accounting firm Ernst & Young, shows raising top individual rates would hurt small-business job creators in particular.” (NFIB, Press Release, 7/17/12) 
How about the rising price of your electric bill? Look out
“President Obama Has Said The Most Important Policy He Could Address In A Second Term Is Climate Change. Obama has an ambitious second-term agenda, which, at least in broad ways, his campaign is beginning to highlight. The President has said that the most important policy he could address in his second term is climate change, one of the few issues that he thinks could fundamentally improve the world decades from now.”
Of course, before he was president, Obama acknowledged what would happen to electricity rates in his ideal world:
“When I was asked earlier about the issue of coal, you know, under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. Even regardless of what I say about whether coal is good or bad. Because I’m capping greenhouse gases, coal power plants, you know, natural gas, you name it, whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, uh, they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.”
Don’t ask him about all the money the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says will bestolen from Medicare:
“According To The Nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Obamacare Cuts $716 Billion From Medicare. (Congressional Budget Office, Letter To Speaker John Boehner, 7/24/12)
Or how the CBO reveals the increased Medicare taxes from ObamaCare:
“Starting In 2013, Obamacare Will Also Expand Medicare Taxes To Investment Income And Increase Payroll Taxes – Costing Taxpayers $318 Billion.”
What about the 43,000 jobs lost overseas because of ObamaCare’s medical device Tax?
“The Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed) released a report Wednesday that says device-makers might ship 43,000 jobs overseas once the tax takes effect in 2013.”
You’re worried about running a deficit in your finances? Don’s ask Obama for advice; he’s planning on growing the deficit exponentially:  
“A new analysis of President Barack Obama’s budget for next year says the deficit scenario for next year isn’t as rosy as the White House figured last month. Friday’s Congressional Budget Office report said Obama’s budget would produce a $977 billion deficit next year — $75 billion more than predicted by the White House.”
That’s just for next year; when you look farther down the road, disaster:
“The Congressional Budget Office said Friday that President Barack Obama’s tax and spending policies will yield $6.4 trillion in deficits over the next decade, more than double the shortfall in CBO’s own fiscal baseline — even after taking credit for reduced war costs.”
And most important of all, on the one issue that is most paramount, national defense, Obama will eviscerate the military:
“The book ‘The Price of Politics,’ by Washington Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward, makes it clear the idea for the draconian spending cuts originated in the White House – and not in Congress. According to the book, excerpts of which were obtained by POLITICO ahead of the Sept. 11 release, President Barack Obama’s top deputies believed the prospect of massive defense cuts would compel Republicans to agree to a deficit-cutting grand bargain. Then-OMB Director Jack Lew, now the White House chief of staff, and White House Legislative Affairs Director Rob Nabors pitched the idea to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Woodward writes.”
1.5 million jobs will be lost:
“’Sequestration ($1 trillion in cuts) assumes across the board spending cuts with losses peaking in the 2013-2014 time period, with 1 million to 1.5 million jobs lost and that could increase the U.S. unemployment rate by nearly 1 percentage point in the near term,’ said Lt. Col. Elizabeth Robbins, a spokeswoman of the Department of Defense.”
Even Obama’s Secretary of Defense admitted on February 16 of this year that there was an impending debacle:
“And let me tell you something if sequester goes into effect, you can throw all of this out the window. Sequester doubles the numbers of cuts, does it through that crazy formula, and guarantees that we are going to hollow the force and devastate our national security.”
The danger of an Obama second term is terrifyingly real.

Friday, August 17, 2012

El Presidente'S IOWA PHOTO OPS BACKFIRE REPEATEDLY


OBAMA'S IOWA PHOTO OPS BACKFIRE REPEATEDLY

 402
 3
 495
 

Print ArticleSend a Tip
 16 Aug 2012 211 POST A COMMENT

Sometimes Barack Obama’s fabled charisma just isn’t enough. On a three-day tour through Iowa to shore up support for his campaign, Obama made a stop each day that turned out to be fruitless.

Day 1: Des Moines.
Obama visited the Iowa State Fair so he could see the fairgrounds’ famous Bud Tent for beers.  A great photo-op was set up; Obama buys a round for beer-drinking buddies who can chortle “four more beers!”
But wait; Mike Cunningham II, the third-generation owner, was not happy; the tent had to undergo a full Secret Service sweep of the area, which meant he was out of business for two hours, costing him roughly $25,000 in revenue, which Cunningham called making a “campaign contribution against my will. I wouldn’t have voted for him before. I won’t again.”
Obama wasting other people’s money for a photo-op? Who’d dream of such a thing?
Day 2: A wind farm in central Iowa.
Obama wanted to highlight his support for tax credits for the wind energy industry, which Mitt Romney opposes.  Another great photo-op? Well…
Jeff Heil, the owner of the farm, and his son Jarret, who is a registered Republican and former staffer for Sen. Chuck Grassley, quietly stated they weren’t voting for Obama either: “It is important to not get caught up in the president's glamorous re-election words and remember President Obama's first term record and rhetoric do not represent Middle America, entrepreneurs, small business owners and farmers,” Jarret Heil said.
Day 3: Davenport.
At the Obama event, which was catered by the Village Corner Deli, the Deli’s owner, Ross Murty, wore a black T-shirt with big, bold white letters that read, “Government didn’t build my business. I did.”
The race in Iowa is a dead heat;  RealClearPolitics has Obama up by a single point, and the most recent local Iowa polls show Romney up by two points. Obama currently leads Romney by a single point in the RealClearPolitics Average for Iowa, and the most recent poll here shows Romney leading Obama by two points.
As Meredith Willson wrote in The Music Man, Iowans are nothing if not stubborn, and no amount of charisma is going to impress them. They wants deeds, not smoke and mirrors.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

El Presidente's ADMINISTRATION PAVES THE WAY FOR SHARIA



 296
 23
 4245
 

Print ArticleSend a Tip
 6 Aug 2012 481 POST A COMMENT

The most terrifying danger Americans face from a second Barack Obama term isn’t the economy, which is scary enough.

The most harrowing prospect is the Obama Administration’s passivity in the face of attempts to introduce aspects of sharia law into our legal system.  Now there is strong and open evidence of the Obama administration collaborating with Islamist activists to ensure the path toward sharia law is accelerated.
Just last week, Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division, was asked this question by Trent Franks (R-AZ), a member of the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on the Constitution: "Will you tell us here today that this Administration's Department of Justice will never entertain or advance a proposal that criminalizes speech against any religion?"
Perez refused to answer. Four times.
And why would Franks target Perez?
Here’s why:
Last October, at George Washington University, there was a meeting between DOJ officials, including Perez, and Islamist advocates against free speech. Representatives from the Islamist side included Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). The ISNA was an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding trial in 2008, as well as functioning as a Muslim Brotherhood Front. The leader of the Islamist attack was Sahar Aziz, an Egyptian-born American lawyer and Fellow at the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding, a Muslim advocacy group based in Michigan. At the meeting, the Islamists lobbied for:
  1. Cutbacks in U.S. anti-terror training
  2. Limits on the power of terrorism investigators
  3. Changes in agent training manuals
  4. A legal declaration that criticism of Islam in the United States should be considered racial discrimination
Aziz said that the word “Muslim” has become “racialized” and, once American criticism of Islam was silenced, the effect would be to "take [federal] money away from local police departments and fusion centers who are spying on all of us.”
And what was the response from Perez and the DOJ officials? 
Nothing.
That’s right: no objection, no defense of our first amendment right to free speech.