Showing posts with label Wes Walker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wes Walker. Show all posts

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Homeschoolers Face Ghosts of the Third Reich




http://clashdaily.com/2013/02/homeschoolers-face-ghosts-of-the-third-reich/


Homeschoolers Face Ghosts of the Third Reich

   
Nazi_Swastika.svgThe following is NOT satire. I wish this were a political jab, partisan polemics, or a violation of Godwin’s Law; but sadly, this is a real news item.
If our story’s protagonists were from some special interest group, things may have played out differently. If the family were running an organic commune, providing a “gender-neutral” environment, or teaching their kids tribal Animism, the major media would probably be backing their cause but —
Sorry, I’m getting ahead of myself. This story is about a family with no special status, just ordinary people fleeing the heavy hand of the Third Reich. Yes, the Third Reich — as in, the government of Adolf Hitler. Of course, Adolf himself is long gone, but some of his legislation remains in force. And that’s where the problem began.
In 1938, Hitler outlawed homeschooling, and the government funneled kids into Hitler Youth, and afterward, the battlefields of WWII. Today, Hitler Youth is defunct, but this old Third Reich law is still being aggressively enforced in Germany. “Aggressively enforced” for this family means roughly $10,000 in fines, police visits to their home, and the threat of the government taking their five children away.
What is the dispute over? They are a homeschooling Christian family, partially because they claim that the State educators are “undermining the tenets of their Christian faith”. The German Supreme Court agrees. The Court described the purpose of the homeschooling ban: “[to] counteract the development of religious and philosophically motivated parallel societies.”
So the family applied for political asylum in the United States. In 2010, the Romeikes and their five children were the first family granted asylum for protection of their homeschooling rights.
Judge Burman called the German policy “utterly repellent to everything we believe as Americans,” and said in his decision, “We can’t expect every country to follow our Constitution. The world might be a better place if it did. However, the rights being violated here are basic human rights that no country has a right to violate.” [emphasis mine]
And that was that, or so it seemed. But Eric Holder is now arguing before the Sixth Circuit to revoke that asylum. “There is no fundamental right to homeschool children” — so says your Attorney-General. Furthermore, because the German law prohibits everyone from homeschooling, Holder says it doesn’t violate anyone’s rights.
Here is a quote from the Home School Legal Defense Association founder Mike Farris, (you may want toread the article in its entirety).
The United States Supreme Court has made it very clear in the past that religious freedom is an individual right. Yet our current government does not seem to understand this. They only think of us as members of groups and factions. It is an extreme form of identity politics that directly threatens any understanding of individual liberty
Let me remind you that is the same Eric Holder, who was held in contempt of congress regarding Fast and Furious, who helped Paul Wilson Dorman by Vacating a Board of Immigration Appeals decision (DOMA case for a same-sex couple), and objects to the Supreme Court ruling that Law Enforcement can check the immigration status of people they have legally detained. And don’t forget this week’s leaked immigration legislation draft where Obama may offer amnesty to criminal immigrants.
Did you see the discrepancy? Eric Holder is inventing ways to allow those who do not legally qualify to enter the country to bypass legislation and (at the same time) is looking to strip the asylum that has already been granted — lawfully! — to an applicant that followed all the proper channels. Seriously, what does this say about their priorities?
For the Romeikes, this is deeply personal. If they lose, their family is in danger of being torn apart. The parents could face prison simply for trying to exercise their religious freedom against their government’s stated goal of preventing it. Much has changed since Luther’s day.
What does this mean for you? You now have elected officials that believe rights are granted by the government, and are not intrinsic to each person. Your government behaves as if it rules over the people. This has serious implications, and is one reason Second Amendment proponents are arming themselves. Once a government believes it rules its people, rather than governing them, it will take liberties with that power and you have all the necessary ingredients for tyranny.
I hope you will voice your support for the Romeikes. They have five children, and deserve better than to be a political football, and the object of disdain by an activist administration.
You might want to contact Eric Holder — and his office — asking why they are defending the legitimacy of policies from the Third Reich, or you might want to visit the Home School Legal Defence Association page, and learn more about how they help families like the Romeikes.
Let’s do more than just complain about our freedoms being eroded. If this concerns you, you can take concrete action. Supporting groups like this one, with your time, money or talent, is one small way that you can push back against government overreach.
If the courts eventually do rule against the Romeikes, please tell them that we’d gladly welcome them to Canada.
Image: Nazi Swastika; author:Fibonacci; public domain


Monday, October 1, 2012

Hey, USA: Look At Your Guy!



   
“Look at your guy. Now look at me.” That Old Spice commercial encouraged us to size up what we have, and compare it with the guy on the screen. Let’s do that with the President.
Since taking Office in ‘08, Obama has governed the States, while Prime Minister Stephen Harper has led Canada. These men ran G7 nations facing very similar circumstances.
It seems fair, and an appropriate time, to contrast their track records during Obama’s tenure. Word constraints will prompt me to use point form comparisons. Although some references may be unfamiliar, I will try to use searchable terms for those who would like more detail. Here we go.
Look at your guy. He is a lawyer / community-organizer. Now look at our guy, an economist and former president of the small-government, lower-tax, anti-union National Citizen’s Coalition.
Trade. Your guy vetoed Keystone and — some would say — violated NAFTA with the “buy American” clause in the stimulus bill. He inked trade deals with S. Korea, Chile and Panama. Our guy has signed 9 new trade deals, and wants deals with 50 other nations.
Military. Your guy, Obama, prioritized military spending cuts. Our guy, Harper, prioritized the modernizing of an aging military.
Environment. Your guy has squandered a king’s ransom on pipe dreams (i.e. Volt, solar energy), and shut the door to opportunity (i.e. Keystone) to appease “Green” pressure groups. Our guy withdrew from Kyoto, and streamlined the environmental assessment process.
Perks. Your POTUS and FLOTUS take separate planes on their trips. Our PM brought Canadian evacuees home from Lebanon on his own plane. (No media were present.)
Respect of Constitution. Your guy led an undeclared war with Libya (end run around Congress), made recess appointments (now challenged), appointed numerous “czars” and generally tilted the Separation of Powers in favour of the executive branch. Our guy honoured Parliament’s decision to bring armed forces home from Afghanistan. He then worked within our existing system, seeking to appoint provincially-elected Senators.
National Borders. Your guy slashed spending and is closing 9 border stations, in the same year that nine headless corpses were swinging from a bridge just over the border from Laredo. Our guy is actively asserting Canadian borders, particularly in the North, anticipating future disputes over resources.
Immigration. Your guy has called his own immigration policy a failure. Our guy is transforming a broken system into one that increasingly detects and deports fraudsters. It has an increased emphasis on skills and language requirements of applicants. Applicants! Meaning: we have final say on whether you immigrate to our country. (Don’t you wish your guy understood that word?)
Law and Order. Your guy has Eric Holder and the DoJ. Fast and Furious. Black Panthers. Presumed that Officer Gates was a racist. Our guy has raised minimum sentencing for certain violent and sexual crimes to counteract an overly-lenient judiciary .
Unions. Your guy is deeply connected and indebted to SEIU, ACORN, and the like. He sympathized with the Wisconsin teachers’ strike and OWS movement. Our guy has negotiated a voluntary pay freeze with our typically-militant public sector unions, and has issued back-to-work legislation for two other unions in strikes he believed would hurt the national economy.
Celebrities. Your guy is a shamelessly fawning fanboy, a “taker” who basks in the fame of others. Our guy stunned a concert audience by joining Yo-Yo Ma in an unannounced onstage performance of a Beatles tune. (He played the piano.)
Budget. Your guy hasn’t bothered to pass one. (What CEO could do that without being fired?) Our guy will take awhile to tame our bloated deficit (2015, likely) but at least he plans to (eventually) tame it.
Business. Your guy slams Joe the Plumber, business, banks, and anyone else that might have a nickel he can squeeze out of a wallet. Taxes are high, and will go higher. As it is, he presides over the highest corporate tax rate (35% in 2010) of any G7 nation. Our guy, conversely, is intentionally making corporate tax more lucrative. Our corporate taxes are now the lowest among developed countries.
Red Tape. Your guy loves it. Bigger and bigger bureaucracies, thousands of new IRS agents, a thousand-plus-page document that you “needed to pass to learn what was in it”! Wow. Ever-widening scope of government powers. Our guy is taking Canada in the other direction. He kept his promise to scrap the Long Gun Registry, and fought against releasing the information to the provinces, for privacy reasons. He removed the legal requirement to fill out the long form census (and associated penalties of fine or prison).
Sovereignty. Your guy installed a “wise Latina” willing to subject American citizens to international law. He also habitually angles for other nations’ approval. He just finished apologizing for any discomfort the First Amendment may have caused to Muslims abroad. He also snubbed Netanyahu so he could go on Letterman. Our guy publicly denounced entrenched anti-semitism, opposed Hamas, and was called an “extraordinary friend of Israel”.
Space is running out, I need to wrap up. I couldn’t even get to employment or debt load. (Look it up, if you think you can handle it.)
“Socialist” Canada could elect a leader like Harper. What could the US do? Look at Obama. Now look at Harper. Look back at Obama. As November 6 approaches, ask yourself: Is your guy really the best the US can do?
Image: Canada’s Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, President Barack Obama; 19 February 2009; www.whitehouse.gov/photogallery/working-with-canada/; Pete Souza; public domain

http://clashdaily.com/2012/09/hey-usa-look-at-your-guy/

h/t MK