Showing posts with label detroit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label detroit. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Gun Violence is Not a Republican Problem, It’s a Democratic Problem


http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/gun-violence-is-not-a-republican-problem-its-a-democratic-problem/




Gun Violence is Not a Republican Problem, It’s a Democratic Problem


Forget Wal-Mart and skip your local gun show. The murderers of tomorrow will not be found wearing orange vests at your local sporting goods store. They won’t have NRA memberships or trophies on their walls.
You won’t find them in America. Look for them in Obamerica.
67% of firearm murders took place in the country’s 50 largest metro areas. The 62 cities in those metro areas have a firearm murder rate of 9.7, more than twice the national average. Among teenagers the firearm murder rate is 14.6 or almost three times the national average.
Those are the crowded cities of Obamerica. Those are the places with the most restrictive gun control laws and the highest crime rates. And many of them have been run by Democrats and their political machines for almost as long as they have been broken.
Obama won every major city in the election, except for Jacksonville and Salt Lake City. And the higher the death rate, the bigger his victory.
He won New Orleans by 80 to 17 where the murder rate is ten times higher than the national average. He won Detroit, where the murder rate of 53 per 100,000 people is the second highest in the country and twice as high as any country in the world, including the Congo and South Africa. He won it 73 to 26. And then he celebrated his victory in Chicago where the murder rate is three times the statewide average.
These places aren’t America. They’re Obamerica.
In 2006, the 54% of the population living in those 50 metro areas was responsible for 67% of armed killings nationwide. Those are disproportionate numbers especially when you consider that for the people living in most of those cities walking into a store and legally buying a gun is all but impossible.
Mayors of Obamerican cities blame guns because it’s easier than blaming people and now the President of Obamerica has turned to the same shameless tactic. The NRA counters that people kill people, but that’s exactly why Obamerican leaders would rather talk about the guns.
Chicago, the capital of Obamerica, is a city run by gangs and politicians. It has 68,000 gang members, four times the number of police officers. Chicago politicians solicit the support of gang members in their campaigns, accepting laundered contributions from them, hiring their members and tipping them off about upcoming police raids. And their biggest favor to the gang bosses is doing nothing about the epidemic of gang violence.
80% of Chicago’s murders are gang-related. But in 1999 when a bill came up in the Illinois State Senate to charge anyone carrying out a firearm attack on school property as an adult, a law that would have largely affected gang members, the future leader of Obamerica voted present. Had he not voted present, it is doubtful that he would have been reelected in an area where gang leaders wield a great deal of influence.
The majority of murders in the cities with the worst homicide rates are gang-related. And while it isn’t always possible to be certain whether a killing was gang-related, the majority of homicide victims in city after city have been found to have criminal records.
In 2010, there were 11,078 firearm homicides in the United States and over 2,000 known gang-related killings, over 90% of which are carried out with firearms. Since 1981, Los Angeles alone has had 16,000 gang related homicides. That’s more than twice the number of Americans killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This is what Obamerica looks like. It’s a place where life is cheap and illegal guns are as available as illegal drugs. It’s the war that we aren’t talking about, because it’s easier to talk about the inanimate objects being used to fight that war.
There are, as John Edwards said, two Americas. America is a country that runs pretty well. And then there’s Obamerica. Not all of Obamerica is broken, but a lot of it is. America does not have a gun violence problem. Obamerica does. And Obamerica has a gun violence problem for the same reason that it has a drug problem and a broken family problem.
Democratic leaders and machines, combined with social workers and justice crusaders have run Obamerica into the ground. Obamerican cities used to be the homes of industry and progress. Now they’re places where young Black and Hispanic men kill each other in growing numbers.
America does not need gun control. It is a mostly law-abiding place. And gun control cannot help Obamerica. Not when its murder rate is driven by gangs who have no trouble obtaining anything; whether it’s legal in the United States or not.
This country does not need to have a conversation about how many bullets should go in a clip. It does need to have a conversation about how many parents should go in a family. It needs to talk about the ghettos of Obamerica and have a serious conversation about broken families and generational dependency.
Obama has become a role model to millions of people in the black community. If anyone can address these problems, it’s him. But instead of trying to solve the problems of Obamerica, instead of doing something about the high levels of unemployment, the broken families and the glamorization of drug dealing and violent crime, he wimped out and picked a fight with rural America.
AIDS prevention was sabotaged by the claim that the disease was a general problem spreading through the population. It wasn’t. Neither is gun violence.
Adam Lanza is as much of a poster boy for gun violence, as Ryan White was for AIDS. A better poster boy for gun violence might be Jay-Z, who boasts of having been a drug dealer and claims to have shot his brother at the age of 12. The drug dealer to millionaire rapper is the Horatio Alger story of Obamerica. And Jay-Z can be seen partying with Obama.
If Obama really wants to get serious about gun violence, then all he has to do is turn to the man standing next to him. But Obama, like every Chicago politician before him, don’t want to end the violence. The death toll is profitable, not just for rappers writing bad poetry about dealing drugs and shooting rivals, but for the politicians atop that heap who score money and gain power by using the problems of Obamerica as some sort of call to conscience for the rest of the country.
That’s what Obama is doing now. Hiding behind Newtown and adorable little kids is the grim specter of Obamerica’s death toll. It’s buried inside the gruesome figures of how many Americans are shot each year issued as an indictment against the entire country in general and gun owners in particular. But those numbers are not an indictment of America. They are an indictment of Democratic mayors and liberal social policy. They are an indictment of Obama.
We need to set aside the same old tired social justice rhetoric and have a serious conversation about what is wrong with New Orleans, Detroit and Chicago. And we need to do it before it’s too late.
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Democratic Platform: El Presidente 'Rescued' Auto Industry -- GM, Chrysler . . .and Ford?



Ford Escape Recall
FILE - In this July 1, 2012 file photo, the Ford logo is seen on cars for sale at a Ford dealership in Springfield, Ill. (AP Photo/Seth Perlman)
(CNSNews.com) - According to the Democratic Party platform, President Obama rescued Detroit’s Big Three automakers – GM, Ford and Chrysler -- leading to their recovery and resurgence.
However, the claim flies in the face of the fact that one of the Big Three – Ford – managed to turn things around by itself, without taking federal help.
According to the Democratic platform: “President Obama and the Democrats boldly rescued America's auto industry, saving more than one million jobs, preventing the collapse of the industry's supply chain, and shoring up countless communities, while revitalizing the backbone of America's manufacturing sector.
“All three of America's biggest auto manufacturers—Chrysler, GM, and Ford—are stronger today because of President Obama's decisive leadership. GM and Chrysler have repaid their outstanding loans years ahead of schedule, new American cars are inspiring pride, and the auto industry added more than 200,000 jobs in the last three years.
President Obama himself, speaking on Labor Day in Detroit, re-iterated the claim.
“And here’s what else we said, Detroit. We said that American autoworkers could once again build the best cars in the world,” Obama told a crowd in Detroit.
“So we stood by the auto industry. And we made some tough choices that were necessary to make it succeed. And now, the Big Three are turning a profit and hiring new workers, and building the best cars in the world right here in Detroit, right here in the Midwest, right here in the United States of America,” he said.
However, Ford refused to accept any of the $80 billion in federal money that GM and Chrysler accepted in 2008 and 2009.
And as CNSNews.com reported, by 2010, one year after the bailout, Ford had managed to turn things around and was posting significant profits without federal help, while both GM and Chrysler made improvements but continued to experience difficulties.
In 2010, Ford earned $6.6 billion -- more than double its 2009 profit of $2.7 billion – and U.S. sales for Ford jumped 20 percent -- double the rate of the industry.
GM, by contrast  received $51 billion in bailout money from taxpayers in the form of Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) money and loans, according to the Treasury Department. The bulk of the money was in the form of equity – meaning, U.S. taxpayers received stock in exchange for the bailout amount.
GM also posted a turnaround in 2010, earning $4.7 billion that year -- its first annual profit in six years -- but most of the profit was owned by American taxpayers.
Chrysler, which received $12.5 billion in TARP funds, ended up losing $652 million in 2010, despite the fact that both sales and profits were up.
U.S. taxpayers, meanwhile, are still not off the hook, as commentator Michelle Malkin explains in her column on CNSNews.com's "The Right Views, Right Now" blog.
Though Chrysler repaid $11.2 billion of its outstanding TARP loans in 2011, six years ahead of schedule, according to the Treasury Department's report to Congress for August, GM has only paid back $23.2 billion -- and still owes $23.4 billion.
And GM's lending subsidiary, Ally (the former General Motors Acceptance Corp.), still owes most (about $15 billion of $17 billion) of the money it received.

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Michigan School District Lies to Christians and Jews Then Sells School Building to maahslimes



school sale conroversyThere is no question that the Detroit suburbs have become the Muslim capital of America.  First they moved in and took over Dearborn and now they seem to be exerting their influence in Farmington.
Located about seventeen miles northwest of Dearborn, Farmington is a community of just over 10,000 people.  Founded in 1824 by a New York Quaker named Arthur Power, the city was originally named Quakertown.  Two years later, the name was changed to Farmington after Power’s hometown in New York.
After what Farmington Public Schools did, they may want to consider changing the name of the town to Muslimtown.
Apparently, the school district had a vacant school property that was valued at $2 million back in 2008.  A Christian church and a Jewish learning center both inquired into the availability to purchase the property and they were both told by the school district that it was not for sale.  Then the school district turned right around and sold the vacant property to the Islamic Cultural Association for $1.1 million.
The school district not only lied to the Christian and Jewish parties interested in the property, they also did not open the sale to outside bids.  Evidently, the school district said it took this action in fear of the Islamic group.  Erin Mersino, an attorney representing the Thomas More Law Center, explained it saying:
“The superintendent from Farmington Public Schools issued a letter and sent it to the attorney general, claiming that they were in fear that the Islamic Cultural Association, the ICA, who purchased Eagle Elementary School, may take some action against the school district under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.”
“It seems like a very strange, new excuse that was issued by the Farmington Public School District, and also one that is inapplicable.”
Head of the Thomas More Law Center, Richard Thompson has requested that a grand jury investigation be launched into the matter.  TMLC gives a list of several items that indicates that the sale of the school property was a ‘backroom deal with the Islamic Cultural Center’:
  • Two FPS Board members accepted campaign contributions from known leaders of ICA.
  • FPS ignored the recommendations of its own specially convened committee NOT TO SELL EAGLE.
  • FPS never listed the property, never retained a broker, never advertised the sale or otherwise engaged the market, as recommended by its own legal counsel and others.
  • FPS repeatedly turned away parties wanting to purchase Eagle Elementary.
  • FPS violated the Open Meetings Act by going into closed session to discuss the sale of Eagle.
  • FPS never notified the public that the vote to sell Eagle was to take place until the public learned about this in the local newspaper.
  • An earlier statement published on the FPS website enumerated several reasons it would not consider closing Eagle Elementary, including the considerable transportation costs that would result from redistricting.
Additionally, Thomas More Law Center points out that the Islamic Cultural Association that pressured the Farmington school district into selling them the vacant property has ties to terrorist organizations:
“ The Council of Islamic Organizations of Michigan, reports that ICA shares direct ties to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (hereinafter “CAIR”) and the North American Islamic Trust, Inc. (hereinafter “NAIT”), both of which were named as unindicted co-conspirators/joint venturers in U.S. v. Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. (“HLF”), the largest terrorism funding trial in U.S. history.   Federal prosecutors proved that HLF worked closely with the U.S. designated terrorist organization Hamas to fund terrorist activities.”
“Moreover, during the HLF trial, several FBI agents testified to the unmistakable financial connections and dealings between HLF, CAIR, and NAIT.  After the trial, the FBI severed ties with CAIR and NAIT due to their status as unsuitable liaison partners.  Steven Pomerantz, the FBI’s former chief of counterterrorism, even noted that “’CAIR, its leaders, and its activities effectively give aid to international terrorist groups.’”
If the ICA is known to have ties to organizations that our government has already identified in court as being terrorist groups, then why are they still being allowed to exist on U.S. soil?  Shouldn’t the FBI do their job and run them out of the country?  We need to start sending a clear and strong message that we are not going to allow Muslim organizations with ties to know terrorists to operate in our country and that message needs to start with the group in Farmington, Michigan.


http://godfatherpolitics.com/6651/michigan-school-district-lies-to-christians-and-jews-then-sells-school-building-to-muslims/


http://visiontoamerica.com/11612/michigan-school-district-lies-to-christians-and-jews-then-sells-school-building-to-muslims/

h/t MK