- Wednesday, September 12, 2012More sharia compliance from top US military brass. Mind you, this is the same General Dempsey whose aircraft was rocket attacked at Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan not a month ago by these same jihadists who adhere to the same Islamic doctrine .General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, called Pastor Terry Jones by phone on Wednesday and "asked him to withdraw his support for a film whose portrayal of the Prophet Mohammad has sparked violent protests."This won't work. It weakens us. Didn't the the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff get the memo that it is his job to defend the Constitution and our basic freedoms, not to curtail them? If these folks wish to restrict free speech, they should move. There are hundreds of countries that restrict speech. Go there. Don't force us to sacrifice our freedoms because you are afraid of offending savages.It's come to this. Even the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff thinks that it if Muslims respond to something with murderous violence, it is up to the non-Muslims to change the way they behave so as to accommodate them. And so eleven years after 9/11, terrorism well and truly won: now if any group wants anything, they know that all they have to do in order to get it is rampage and riot and kill.Also, this film didn't "spark violent protests." The film has been on YouTube since 2011. Someone found the film and thought it would serve as a pretext for attacks on Americans on September 11.And in response, General Dempsey calls those who are supposedly responsible for the film and asks them to submit voluntarily to Sharia restrictions on the freedom of speech regarding Islam.Turn out the lights. It's all over."Top U.S. military officer calls pastor over film," Reuters, September 12 (thanks to Gerard):WASHINGTON (Reuters) - General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke with Pastor Terry Jones by phone on Wednesday and asked him to withdraw his support for a film whose portrayal of the Prophet Mohammad has sparked violent protests - including one that ended with the death of America's envoy to Libya. "In the brief call, Gen. Dempsey expressed his concerns over the nature of the film, the tensions it will inflame and the violence it will cause," Dempsey's spokesman, Colonel Dave Lapan, told Reuters. "He asked Mr. Jones to consider withdrawing his support for the film." U.S. military officials are concerned that the film could inflame tensions in Afghanistan, where 74,000 U.S. troops are fighting. The Taliban earlier on Wednesday called on Afghans to prepare for a fight against Americans and urged insurgents to "take revenge" on U.S. soldiers over the film.Posted by Pamela Geller on Wednesday, September 12, 2012 at 09:20 PM in Embassy jihad: "War Spring", FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE AGE OF JIHAD
Showing posts with label martin dempsey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label martin dempsey. Show all posts
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: ROBERT SPENCER: El Presidente WILL “MAKE NETANYAHU PAY”
Monday, September 10,
2012
Obama Will “Make Netanyahu Pay”
By Robert Spencer
By Robert Spencer
The elimination and
then restoration (after, and only after, a national outcry) of language calling
Jerusalem the capital of Israel from the Democrat Party platform last week was
revealing enough, but a more significant abandonment of Israel came when the
Pentagon decided to decrease drastically its participation in a joint military exercise
with the Jewish state – while pursuing military exercises with
the new Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt.
At the same time, the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Martin Dempsey, even suggested that an
Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites would be a crime, and that the U.S.
would have no part of it, when he said: “I don’t want to be complicit if they
choose to do it.”
An Israeli official
explained that the diminishment of the joint exercise was “the Obama
administration’s response to the dinner party Netanyahu held in Romney’s
honor,” and another took a longer view: “Regardless of the exercise, the
relations between Israel and the US have soured.” Most ominously, one official
noted: “The US elections are in two months, and there is no doubt that President
Barack Obama, if he is reelected, will make Netanyahu pay for his behavior. It
will not pass quietly.”
Such a view is widely
shared stateside – especially among those who long for just such an
eventuality. The crude and arrogant stealthIslamic
supremacist Reza Aslan tweeted gleefully: “The way Bibi has
tried to manipulate and embarrass Obama at every turn, he should be scared
shitless of Obama’s reelection.”
Israeli officials attributed Iran’s increasingly
brazen statements of its genocidal intentions toward Israel and belligerence
toward America well to this Obama Administration stance. One explained: “This
is why the Iranians are issuing threatening statements against the US.
Washington’s hesitant policy is making the Iranians feel freer to move ahead
with the nuclear program. This is not how you create deterrence to avoid a military operation.”
Indeed, and it is a far
cry from Obama’s address at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee
(AIPAC) in May 2011, when he struck a conciliatory tone: “Even while we may at
times disagree, as friends sometimes will, the bonds between the United States
and Israel are unbreakable, and the commitment of the United States to the security of
Israel is ironclad.”
Yet even when he spoke
them, those words were hollow, and they’re even hollower now. According to
Shimon Shiffer in Ynet News,
the Administration’s abandonment of Israel in its attempt to head off an
Iranian nuclear bomb wasn’t remotely limited to Dempsey’s “don’t want to be
complicit” remark: “The United States has indirectly informed Iran, via two
European nations, that it would not back an Israeli strike against the
country’s nuclear facilities, as long as Tehran refrains from attacking
American interests in the Persian Gulf…According to the report, Washington used
covert back-channels in Europe to clarify that the US does not intend to back
Israel in a strike that may spark aregional conflict.”
Not only did Obama
inform a nation that considers itself an enemy of the U.S. that it would not
support a U.S. ally, but Ynet added that Obama “is promoting a series
of steps meant to curb an Israeli offensive against Iran, while forcing the
Islamic Republic to take the nuclear negotiations more seriously.”
In that context it is
useful to remember what the Kuwaiti MP Jama’an Al-Harbash said on al-Jazeera in
March 2010: “This is a war of religion, not just a war between Arabs and
Israelis, or a war between liberators and occupiers. This is an ideological
war, an Islamic war, which will end in victory only under the banner of
Jihad.”
Those who believe such
things will never be compelled to take “nuclear negotiations” seriously enough
to end the jihad against Israel. Islamic supremacists will never accept
Israel’s existence, even if the “Palestinians” have a state, and even if Obama
makes all kinds of concessions to Iran to get them to take negotiations more
seriously. On the contrary: the Islamic supremacists will be emboldened to
fight on for final victory against their weakened foe.
Netanyahu, and Israel,
must not be “made to pay.” All free people must now stand against Obama,
against the jihadis who wish to destroy the Jewish State, and with Israel.
Mr. Spencer is director
of Jihad Watch and
author of The Politically
Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), The Truth About
Muhammad, Stealth Jihad and The Complete
Infidel's Guide to the Koran (all from Regnery-a HUMAN
EVENTS sister company).
Posted by Pamela Geller on
Monday, September 10, 2012 at 09:01 AM in SPENCER!
Labels:
allah,
atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com,
Benjamin 'Bibi' Netanyahu,
gay,
genocidal intention,
Iran,
islam,
martin dempsey,
muslim,
Muslim Brotherhood,
obama,
Pamela Geller,
pedophile,
Robert Spencer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)