Monday, September 10,
2012
Further proof the 911 families are right. They have been begging the Feds to
take over this monster.
If the 9/11 Memorial is supposed to be a “National Memorial” which
deserves federal funding, then it is obligated to operate with fiscal
responsibility and honor.
Bravo to the 911 family
members who are taking on the elitist corruptocrats commanding the finances and
critical decision-making of the 911 Memorial and Museum, as if it were their
own personal fiefdom. The family members are calling for their removal and for
the 911 Memorial Museum to be placed under the National Park Service, as are
all other national memorials. The project has been rife with controversy and
fiscal mismanagement under the current leadership.
Many 9/11 families have advocated for the honorable
and respectful interment of unidentified 9/11 human remains at Ground Zero --
but NOT in a Museum. Nearly a decade ago, families were assured that these
remains would be located in a "separate and distinct repository
-separate from any Museum or Visitor Center." Family groups were
promised this by the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC)
in writing in 2003, via the "WTC Memorial Guidelines" written by the
Family Advisory Council and agreed to by the LMDC. At that time, the small
number of group leaders who met with the LMDC could never have imagined that
the honorable and respectful interment promised would result in a shell game
that plans to place 9,000 unidentified remains 70 feet (7 stories)
below ground in a dangerous, distasteful and dishonorable manner.
9/11 family members were faced with the adamant refusal of Joe Daniels, President
& CEO of the 9/11 Memorial and Museum Foundation (9/11MM), to survey WTC
family members in order to ask them for permission to put their loved ones'
remains in a museum. WTC familiesfiled a lawsuit, seeking to force the
City of New York to release the names of the 2,749 family members whose loved
ones died on 9/11, for the purpose of notifying and seeking the input of the
families regarding the City’s and the 9/11MM’s plan.
This has fallen on the
deaf ears of Ayatollah Bloomberg.
For this dereliction of
duty, these Bloomberg quislings, the 9/11MM officials, have been remunerated
handsomely. Daniels pocketed
$371,307. Museum director Alice Greenwald made $351,000,
and capital planning Vice President Joan Gerner soaked up $337,143 before
leaving last spring. Development director Cathy Blaney raked in $322,292. The
full-time foundation employee also worked last year as a fund-raiser
for Gov. Cuomo's election campaign.
"9/11 memorial which cost $700million to build now
needs $1million per WEEK to run" Daily Mail
With its huge reflecting pools, ringed by waterfalls and
skyscrapers, and a cavernous underground museum still under construction, the
National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center is an
awesome spectacle that moved and inspired some 4.5million visitors in its first
year.
ut all that
magnificence comes with a jaw-dropping price tag. The foundation that runs the
memorial estimates that once the $700million project is complete, the memorial
and museum will together cost $60million a year to operate.
The anticipated cost has
bothered some critics and raised concerns even among the memorial's allies that
the budget may be unsustainable without a hefty government subsidy.
Pricey: The 9/11
memorial is set to cost $60 million a year to run
By comparison, the
National Park Service budgeted $8.4million this year to operate and maintain
Gettysburg National Military Park and $3.6million for the monument that
includes the USS Arizona Memorial at Pearl Harbor. Running Arlington National
Cemetery, which has more than 14,000 graves and receives 4million visitors a
year, costs $45million annually.
Officials at the 9/11
memorial say they face unique challenges that make comparisons to other
national memorials difficult.
The foundation plans to
spend at least a fifth of its operating budget, or around $12million per year,
on private security because of terrorism fears. Visitors to the
memorial plaza pass through airport-like security, and armed guards patrol
the grounds.
'The fact of the matter
is that this was a place that was attacked twice,' said Joseph Daniels, the
foundation's president and chief executive.
Project: The complex has
not yet been completed 11 years on from 9/11
Just operating the two
massive fountains that mark the spots where the twin towers once stood will
cost another $4.5million to $5million annually, according to a spokesman.
Foundation officials
have refused to answer to requests for information about other costs at the
site, including the anticipated expense of running the museum, which is still
unfinished.
The museum was supposed
to open this month, but construction all but ceased a year ago because of a funding squabble
between the foundation and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which
owns the land the memorial sits on.
Mr Daniels said it will
take at least a year for the museum to open once construction resumes,
meaning the site may not be fully complete until at least 2014.
The failure to open the
museum on time has thrown off the foundation's financial planning. Officials
had expected to use the museum, being built mostly with money from
various government agencies, plus private donations, as its main source of
revenue.
Remembrance: The
memorial pays tribute to the victims of September 11
While visitors will be
allowed into the above-ground portions of the memorial for free, the foundation plans to
charge people to descend into the museum's exhibition space, where they will
see portraits of the nearly 3,000 victims, hear oral histories of the tragedy
and view artifacts such as the staircase World Trade Center workers used to
flee on 9/11.
The admission price
hasn't been set. Foundation officials say they may also charge a 'suggested
donation' where visitors would be allowed to enter for free but would be
strongly encouraged to pay.
But if the museum gets
the 2million visitors a year the foundation expects, a $12 fee, like the one
charged at the memorial to the victims of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, would
cover 40 per cent of the operating costs. More money will be
generated through fundraising and the sale of memorabilia.
In addition, the
foundation and several elected officials have proposed that the American public
pick up one-third of the operating costs.
So far, Congress has
balked. A bill proposed by Hawaii's Senator Daniel Inouye that would have had
the National Park Service contribute $20million per year ran into opposition
from Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, who pointed out that the federal government had
already spent $300million on the project.
A National Park Service
official testified at a hearing that $20million is more than the agency can
afford, and larger than the entire annual appropriation for nearly 99 per cent
of the parks in its system.
Posted by Pamela Geller on
Monday, September 10, 2012 at 05:55 PM in 911 Memorial and
Museum
Monday, September 10,
2012
Further proof the 911 families are right. They have been begging the Feds to take over this monster.
9/11 family members were faced with the adamant refusal of Joe Daniels, President & CEO of the 9/11 Memorial and Museum Foundation (9/11MM), to survey WTC family members in order to ask them for permission to put their loved ones' remains in a museum. WTC familiesfiled a lawsuit, seeking to force the City of New York to release the names of the 2,749 family members whose loved ones died on 9/11, for the purpose of notifying and seeking the input of the families regarding the City’s and the 9/11MM’s plan.
No comments:
Post a Comment