PRUDEN: The tall talker and the old geezers
-
The Washington Times
Friday, March 8, 2013
·
·
Udi's Gluten Free BreadTry the #1 Best Selling Gluten-Free Bread. Print
a $1 off CouponNow.UdisGlutenFree.com/Coupon
STORY TOPICS
·
Politics
FOLLOW US ON
QUESTION OF THE DAY
|
·
|
·
Yes
|
|
·
|
·
No
|
|
·
|
·
Undecided
|
|
·
|
·
Other
|
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
Talking is the national
sport in Washington. For the old geezers in Congress,
it’s more fun than watching baseball, complaining about the weather or
remembering sex.
Nobody drones on like a
U.S. senator and nobody loves the sound of his raspy voice like a U.S. senator. Rand Paul, the freshman from Kentucky who stars in the bad
dreams of every Republican geezer in town, talked for almost 13 hours on the Senate floor
this week to delay a confirmation vote
on John O. Brennan as director of the CIA, and earned only the scorn of the geezers.
Mr. Paul’s remarks occasionally strayed a few degrees over
the top (enough of the “Hitler” comparisons), decrying the prospect of using
drones against American citizens in America, but he strayed no further over the
top than almost any congressman on almost any day on Capitol Hill. Mr. Paul argued at length (though not at record
length) that assassinating an American, even an evil terrorist with an U.S.
passport, deprives him of the due process guaranteed by the Constitution.
Challenging President
Obama on anything will earn anybody the sneers and scorn of Democratic senators,
but some of the Republican geezers joined the din of disdain, mostly about the
temerity of a freshman senator talking when he should be listening to a
housebroken geezer talk. It’s not the sharks who trouble the waters in
Washington, but the minnows who nibble good men to death.
Sen. John McCain of Arizona rebuked the
filibusterer just as he was sitting down, and just after Mr. McCain and a few of his Senate pals
emerged from a cozy dinner with President Obama in the glow of fine wine and
the warmth of a full belly of beef. Mr. McCain had a little patronizing
advice for his talkative colleague: “Calm down, senator, the U.S. government cannot randomly target
U.S. citizens.”
The presidential loser
of 2008 sent further advice on how
to win friends and influence voters: “If Mr. Paul wants to be taken seriously, he needs to do
more than pull political stunts that fire up impressionable libertarian kids. I
don’t think what happened is helpful to the American people.”
Nobody expected Mr. Paul’s filibuster to stop the confirmation of John Brennan, the senator himself least of
all, but he set out to sound an “alarm” about the use of drones in what he
calls the threat to Americans by their own government. He had written to the White House to inquire whether the government could order a drone strike
against an American on American soil, and Attorney Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. replied with
reassurance that does not necessarily reassure. He said drones are limited to
killing in conflict zones in Pakistan and Yemen, and the government has “no intention” to bomb any
place specific.
So far the argument is
about drones and the word “random.” How vague can the word “random” be? The U.S. government can, and already has,
targeted American citizens without due process. The government had no drones at Ruby Ridge,
where government agents targeted and killed a teenage American boy, and had no
drones at Waco, where government agents set fire to a religious compound and 76
men, women and children burned alive, Americans all.
The government’s record is not a good one. The government’s “intentions” can change, and
“random” is a word even a jackleg lawyer could parse far into the next decade.
It’s just not cricket to say so, and a geezer never would.
The confirmation
hearings of John Brennan and Chuck Hagel reveal a lot about how
Washington works, how weak and well-meaning geezers can conflate the good of
the country with the good of their own biases. Mr. McCain and Sen. Lindsey Graham of
South Carolina took Mr. Hagel apart at his confirmation
hearing, leaving him humiliated as few nominees have been humiliated. But when
crunch time came, they fell into line, voting to confirm him despite all the
flags they raised at his hearing, as if to say, “just kidding, guys.”
Mr. Brennan escaped close scrutiny over
his role in the fiasco at Benghazi, where four Americans, including the
American ambassador to Libya, died because the Obama White House could not or would not send
the help the ambassador begged for — not even a drone.
The geezers know better,
but it’s easier, quieter, and more refined to do nothing. When Mr. Paul, over the top or not, stood up to demand answers
to some of the questions the geezers themselves raised, he was ridiculed and
told, like an irritable child, to calm down. Geezers think their role is to
pour oil over troubled waters, when they should be striking a match.
• Wesley Pruden is
editor emeritus of The Washington Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment