Tuesday, July 31, 2012
OBAMA'S STATE DEPT CRITICISES FRENCH
ISLAMIC VEIL BAN
Historically America has been the global force
for freedom. This has been our role in the world. It is only now, under Obama,
that America has become a retrograde enforcer of everything we have stood
against in our history: oppression, subjugation, and discrimination.
The full face veil is not religious. Even Muhmmad said that the
woman's body should be covered, not the face and hands. So it's a political
statement. A supremacist, racist sharia political statement. That is what
America is getting behind. Stunning.
“The US is mixing up religious freedom with
freedom of conscience,” he told FRANCE 24 on Tuesday. “In France we respect
religion, but we also respect atheism. Believers and non-believers must have
equal treatment under the law.”
The French are giving us lessons on freedom of conscience.
"US report criticises French Islamic veil ban" France 24, July 31, 2012 (thanks to David)

A wide-ranging US State Department report
has criticised France and Belgium for passing controversial lawsthat
prevent women from wearing full Islamic veils.
The US on Monday
criticised France and Belgium for banning women from wearing face-covering
Islamic veils in public, while warning of growing anti-Semitism and hostility
towards Muslims in Europe.
The US State
Department’s report on religious freedoms, researched in 2011
but released on July 30, 2012, warned that freedom of worship was being
undermined across the globe -- particularly in China and Pakistan.
Commenting on the report, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
said that more than a billion people worldwide lived “under governments that
systematically repress religious freedom.”
“When it comes to this human right -- this key feature of
stable, secure and peaceful societies -- the world is sliding backwards,” she
said.
In Europe there was "growing xenophobia, anti-Semitism,
anti-Muslim sentiment, and intolerance toward people considered 'the
other’," according to the report, which also complained of a "rising
number of European countries, including Belgium and France,
whose laws restricting dress adversely affected Muslims and
others."
France bans the niqab
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
OBAMA'S STATE DEPT CRITICISES FRENCH
ISLAMIC VEIL BAN

|
France enacted its controversial law tha outlaws the wearing of
“burka” or “niqab”-type full-face veils in public in April 2011 (Belgium passed
its own law in July 2011) under then-President Nicolas Sarkozy, a move that led
to accusations that the president was pandering to far-right voters.
Sarkozy was defeated by Socialist opponent François Hollande in
May 2012 -- although France’s new president said he had no intention of
overturning the ban.
One French commentator, Socialist-supporting philosopher Henri
Pena-Ruiz, said Hollande’s reluctance to change the law demonstrated
that it had cross-party support while reflecting France’s longstanding attitude
to religion.
“The US is mixing up religious freedom with freedom of
conscience,” he told FRANCE 24 on Tuesday. “In France we respect religion, but
we also respect atheism. Believers and non-believers must have equal treatment
under the law.”
“And what freedom is this report defending exactly?” he asked.
“When France banned Islamic head coverings in schools [in 2004], many
girls said that they didn’t want to wear them and that if head scarves were not
forbidden, their brothers and fathers would force them to cover up."
“Clinton needs to think more about the emancipation of women. It
is not as straightforward an issue as the State Department portrays.”
A long history of secularism
France legislated for a total separation of church and state in
1905, a move that had its ideological roots in the country’s 1789 revolution.
This law, coupled with France’s prior experience of powerful
[Catholic] church interests in government, goes a long way to explaining the
country’s hard stance on religious symbols, according to Christopher Dickey,
head of Newsweek magazine’s Paris bureau.
He said it also demonstrates the different attitude from the
perspective of the US, a country that had never experienced the “domination of
an all-powerful religious institution [like the Catholic Church in France] at
the heart of government.”
But Dickey rejected the idea that the ban on wearing niqab and
burka-type headwear was anything other than “a hostile act” by a president
desperate to hold on to power.
“This report was researched at a time when Nicolas Sarkozy was
transparently pandering to the far right and effectively legitimising
xenophobia,” he told FRANCE 24. “It was recognised as such by the French who
voted him out.”
A 'false and divisive issue'
Dickey pointed out that the ban only affects some 2,000 of up to
three million Muslim women in France: “When you make an issue about such a tiny
minority you are making a statement about your attitude to Islam.”
As for Hollande’s unwillingness to scrap the controversial law,
this was much more because it was a “false and divisive” issue.
“Hollande and his Socialist government certainly don’t want to
spend political capital trying to overturn it at a time when there are far more
serious concerns,” he said.
But they may have to. On Friday July
28 a riot broke out in Marseille when police tried to check theidentification of
a woman wearing a niqab on the street, as the law requires them to
do.
“The test will be whether the Hollande
government really wants to enforce this ban,” Dickey said. “They will have to
ask themselves if they are actually keeping the peace by implementing it.”

No comments:
Post a Comment